I am not able to enter into Wikileaks. I wanted to see how the database was organized. But I did not.
Like many, I think, I wonder what this sudden avalanche of documents available on Wikileaks. A great favor done to historians, librarians, catalogers RER to open access? Maybe! Look for the reference librarian ;-). Do not indulge your favors those who can provide you with so much good material? Seriously, who else but these categories could go in ecstasy for such a mass of resources at last - for how long? accessible? And how many disquisitions on the authority of these sources can we do? How do we know if a document of the Department of State has just one watermark there?
reports that diplomats should send more or less restricted to their governments on issues of interest to them, such as money, weak spots, dangerous friendships with friends and allies, then we know from a few centuries. Those useless parasites historians have allowed us to even look at secret dispatches Venetian ambassadors, as early as the sixteenth century (if you look at SBN here you find many more).
Operations of this magnitude made today by an attacker more or less lonely? Mah And to what end? The noise caused by the same amount of data stifles the detailed information. We are not all'inchiodare the U.S. to blame for the war in Iraq. E 'at the same time much more and much less useful, because it does not seem to have a purpose directed to illuminate a precise fact, if not demonstrate the vulnerability of today's U.S. administration. That just drips.
's interview Peacereporter hacker H @ rlock PeaceReporter - SmokyLeaks is the first attempt to propose an interpretation that I read further. Not much to tell the truth. I am not convinced the idea that all this distraction from the global crisis, I think reading too general and too boring - along the lines of "faithful to the plot line of capital." Better than the rest of the interview. If I had to advance a hypothesis, it seems to me a huge showdown between parts of the U.S. and foreign countries. If there is someone or something definitely affected by the revelations is the Department of State and the Secretary thereof, Rodham. Granted after a dip in the mass of information on a mo 'fountain of chocolate - but how many actually did so among non-specialists? especially those who are really able to contact that site? there would have to understand more about where prodest at this point.
Yes, there is work for you ;-).
0 comments:
Post a Comment